Joined
·
15,750 Posts
You can't grow algae (enough of a biomass to use as a nutrient export system) in a low nutrient state nor claim that any system with a increasing algal biomass is a low nutrient state in stasis. Algae's increase in biomass is an ecological marker for eutrophication. It is like trying to grow Kentucky fescue in a desert... in order to export water. Either it is a desert, devoid of water or there is enough water to support the grass or there is grass, therefore water, therefore not a desert. This is the only logical outcome.
Any ecologist worth their salt can pick out bioindicators like algae... for example
http://www.waterboards.ca.gov/water_issues/programs/swamp/docs/presentations/newtool_wqa_algae.pdf
(or if you need a basic refresher)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bioindicator
Any ecologist worth their salt can pick out bioindicators like algae... for example
http://www.waterboards.ca.gov/water_issues/programs/swamp/docs/presentations/newtool_wqa_algae.pdf
(or if you need a basic refresher)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bioindicator
The algae in you system proves there is an abundance of N and P for it to exist. You can not prove that the algae is keeping it at a low level because phosphate test kits are not sensitive enough to reach the point where P becomes limited and often has too much of a margin of error to be useful. In addition, the competely miss organic P so test kits miss a large amount of P, are not sensitive enough, and if there is a large enough amount of algal biomass, it will convert inorganic P into organic in a tight enough of a loop with bacteria that it will foul your test. When it comes to inaccurate test kits, using bio-indicators is an extremely precise testing method.The composition and total biomass of algal species in aquatic systems serves as an important metric for organic pollution and nutrient loading such as nitrogen and phosphorus.