Sponsor Our Community
Go Back   The Reef Tank > The Reference Place > Equipment, Start-up, and Education Archive > Lighting Archive

Lighting Archive Search here for lighting information.


Registered Members don't see these ads. Register now it's free!

 
 
Thread Tools
Old 02-06-2004, 03:36 PM   #1
XburningempiresX
Little Fishy
 
XburningempiresX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 93

MH and T5 or VHO or PC?


i have a 75 gallon tank on its way to reefdom, what i lack now is good lighting. i was going to use 2 250 MH bulbs and ballasts, but i was unsure what to use for Actintics. T5, VHO, or PC? the tank is roughly 48"L x 18"D x 24"T (maybe taller)

so i was thinking of either 2 96w PC, 2 110w VHO, or 4 54w T5 since 1 workhorse 7 can power either combination.

is there any advantages for one over the other as far as light output?
Registered Members don't see these ads. Register now it's free!
__________________
75 gallon Plexi
20 gallon sump/refuge with 35+ lbs. of rubble
FOWLR slowly evolving into Reef, Protein Skimmer, 3 powerheads
65+lbs of LR
20ish pounds of base rock
** Signature truncated to 5 lines **
XburningempiresX is offline  
Old 02-06-2004, 03:41 PM   #2
reefcam
Going Broke
 
reefcam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: OR
Posts: 1,594
My perference would be to go with 4 54W T5. I've never usd the 96W PC, but have used the 55W and 60W PC and have to say, death to PC for my setup. If you are looking for intensity, then I would go wtih 4 T5. I have compared 4 110W VHO (which is going to a friend) vs. 4 54W T5, and hands down the T5 looks very clean and bright. I've also kept clams under T5 (Croceas didn't seem to mind it, but Maximas were a bit tempermental).

I'm upgrading my lighting in my prop tank to 16 T5 bulbs. Since I don't have the space for MH lamps, the intensity of the T5 should make up for it. Too early to say, but in a recent test, I colored up a Pink Stylo from brown.
__________________
Proud to be a "Reef Keeper"
reefcam is offline  
Old 02-06-2004, 03:44 PM   #3
XburningempiresX
Little Fishy
 
XburningempiresX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 93
thanks reefcam,

i eventually want SPS, LPS and some clams..... as well as softies, but i want to make sure i provide for the needs of the demanding corals. i have the room for MH, so i am guessing 2 250w MH and 4 54w T5 would do the trick.

thanks,
Steve
__________________
75 gallon Plexi
20 gallon sump/refuge with 35+ lbs. of rubble
FOWLR slowly evolving into Reef, Protein Skimmer, 3 powerheads
65+lbs of LR
20ish pounds of base rock
** Signature truncated to 5 lines **
XburningempiresX is offline  
Old 02-06-2004, 03:54 PM   #4
reefcam
Going Broke
 
reefcam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: OR
Posts: 1,594
I like them because they are low profile and put out more light IMO than other bulbs (aside MH). I'll try to do some measurements tonight and with a PAR meter and report back.

I think you would have ample amount of light. The only down side is, the 54W T5 uses the same electricity as a 110W VHO. So you can't take an Ice Cap 660 and run 8 T5 on it. You would think so, but not the case.

I'll take a picture of the new system with lighting to give you a good idea. Keep in mind, the tanks are 12" hight and the lights are low due to shelf space. Not because the lights require it.

Jim
__________________
Proud to be a "Reef Keeper"
reefcam is offline  
Old 02-06-2004, 04:51 PM   #5
BuckWheat
AKA Scooterman
 
BuckWheat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Lafayette, La.
Posts: 352
Quote:
Originally posted by reefcam
. The only down side is, the 54W T5 uses the same electricity as a 110W VHO.

Jim
One watt of power is one watt of power consumptiong regardless of any type bulb!
BuckWheat is offline  
Old 02-06-2004, 04:55 PM   #6
reefcam
Going Broke
 
reefcam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: OR
Posts: 1,594
Buckwheat,

That's what i thought too. So I e-mail IceCap and they ran some test and are also unsure. Maybe someone with a better understanding of T5 could chime in.

I wanted to run 8 T5 bulbs off my IC 660, since it was able to light 4 x 110W VHO. So you would think that it would be able to handle 8 x 54W T5 HO bulbs.

Jim
__________________
Proud to be a "Reef Keeper"
reefcam is offline  
Old 02-06-2004, 05:10 PM   #7
BuckWheat
AKA Scooterman
 
BuckWheat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Lafayette, La.
Posts: 352
No not the case! 54wT5 is made to run on a ballast designed for the T5 to run at that power ratio, OHMS Law, still comes into play, one watt is one watt and can't be any different, what is happing is they are probably either under or over driven on the IC660. I've been an electrical designer for over 15 years trust me.

Last edited by BuckWheat; 02-06-2004 at 05:17 PM.
BuckWheat is offline  
Old 02-06-2004, 05:13 PM   #8
BuckWheat
AKA Scooterman
 
BuckWheat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Lafayette, La.
Posts: 352
There must be a difference in the phosphorus or something in the T5 that the electronics in the 660 isn't designer to run. It may drive a few bulbs but probably not the best idea to do that unless it is certified by Ice Cap themselves!
BuckWheat is offline  
Old 02-06-2004, 05:29 PM   #9
reefcam
Going Broke
 
reefcam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: OR
Posts: 1,594
Thanks Buckwheat.

Well I still like the T5s. The only part I hate about it, is the cost.... **** bulbs are even new to the lighting industry.
__________________
Proud to be a "Reef Keeper"
reefcam is offline  
Old 02-06-2004, 05:33 PM   #10
BuckWheat
AKA Scooterman
 
BuckWheat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Lafayette, La.
Posts: 352
hey no gripes here, overseas they have been very popular & claims they out perform VHO's & some aspects of MH but don't believe it all unless test are done, which I haven't seen much of.
T5's are Pc by the way, just different types, depending on the manufacturer that is.

Last edited by BuckWheat; 02-06-2004 at 05:38 PM.
BuckWheat is offline  
Old 02-06-2004, 05:35 PM   #11
chewie
bug hunter
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: PDX
Posts: 815
IC says the 660 will run 4' 54w bulbs at about 80w.

Also, the 660 has a maximum lamp length of 16'.

If I ever run out of VHO bulbs I will go T5's for sure!
chewie is offline  
Old 02-06-2004, 05:38 PM   #12
chewie
bug hunter
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: PDX
Posts: 815
Quote:
Originally posted by BuckWheat

T5's are Pc by the way, just different types, depending on the manufacturer that is.
Actually the CSL/Panasonic PC's are T6 bent in half. Catalina brand PC's are T5 bent in half.
chewie is offline  
Old 02-06-2004, 05:38 PM   #13
BuckWheat
AKA Scooterman
 
BuckWheat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Lafayette, La.
Posts: 352
Now that sounds about right on both accounts!
BuckWheat is offline  
Old 02-06-2004, 05:45 PM   #14
XburningempiresX
Little Fishy
 
XburningempiresX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 93
so one workhorse 7 would power 4 T5's @ 54w each or higher?

thanks buckwheat, chewie and reefcam,

Steve
__________________
75 gallon Plexi
20 gallon sump/refuge with 35+ lbs. of rubble
FOWLR slowly evolving into Reef, Protein Skimmer, 3 powerheads
65+lbs of LR
20ish pounds of base rock
** Signature truncated to 5 lines **
XburningempiresX is offline  
Old 02-06-2004, 05:54 PM   #15
BuckWheat
AKA Scooterman
 
BuckWheat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Lafayette, La.
Posts: 352
A little more or less shouldn't hurt, as chewie pointed out diameter and length does affect how many you can use safely.
BuckWheat is offline  
 

Bookmarks

Tags
actinic light , actinic lighting , lux meter , sps tank , super actinic , true actinic , uri super actinic , uri vho , vho ballast , vho bulbs


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Sitemap:1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190
Sponsor Our Community

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:42 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Our lawyer tells us that, by pressing the "New Thread" or "New Reply" button, you acknowledge that the opinions and information expressed in your article are yours alone and not those of thereeftank.com, dba The Reef Tank. Further, you agree to indemnify The Reef Tank, its moderators, administrators and agents from any and all liability which may arise as a result of your article. (C)opyright 2006 TheReefTank.com