|
|
Have a question?
It's Free!
|
|
| General Reef Discussion In this forum we discuss issues related to keeping marine and reef aquariums in a friendly flame-free environment. |
Registered Members don't see these ads. Register now it's free!
11-30-2007, 12:05 PM
|
#1
|
|
spaceman spiff

Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: south of Dimples
Posts: 10,636
Reviews: 72
|
The overly descriptive sump build thread
I find my current sump design lacking for the way my tank is set up, and I'm half way decided to build a new one. I'm not fully committed, but I've gone as far as to begin sketching some stuff to see how it would fit, and I'm interested in getting ideas to help ensure I won't be building another one in another year. This will go on my 150 gallon tank, and you can see how packed the first sump was planned on this post. The only difference was that I didn’t put the calcium reactor over the sump as the picture implies, as it was too tall for my liking.
So after clicking that link and seeing the picture, there are two reasons why I'm interested in a new sump. First, the "refugium" I had designed into the first sump was useless, just a waste of space. I had to supply water to it and I didn’t keep anything there. Second, I find a I have a lot of particulate in the water column, and I wanted to add some settling space before water gets to the return pump. And a third reason that I just remembered, to better isolate the water height of the skimmer (if I kill the return pump on my current design, the water level increases in the skimmer section and it overflows the collection cup… I forget about that nearly everytime I turn the return pump off). So here's the new thought, with a forward and top-down view (this is the whole stand, and not all the components are featured in this drawing).
New sump specifics;
Overall dimensions: 46x17.5x18 ~63 gallons
Skimmer section: 14x11x18 ~12 gallons
Settling section: 15x10x18 ~12 gallons
Return section: 15x9.5x18 ~ 11 gallons (includes baffles)
Main changes include;
- Adding 3 gallons of space before increasing skimmer water level
- Moving "refugium" in front of return section (it will not employ a DSB, macro algae, or anything else)
- Adding 10 gallons of system volume
- Moving skimmer output to settling section (flow through sump will be around 750gph, skimmer processes about 70% of that at best)
- Float switches will be installed in return section, but kalkwasser auto-top off will be dumped in the settling section with the calcium reactor effluent
Initial concerns and questions;
- The hose bend on the left return line is much sharper than it was, I'm a little concerned of pinching the hose or having the pump sit funny (thereby causing noisy vibrations).
- What's the best way to have the drain water flow into the skimmer section? I think by having the skimmer output dump into another section, it's irrelevant as all water in that part of the sump will be unprocessed.
- Will this open area for settling be adequate to help remove some of the particulate in my tank? How would that change if I put the calcium reactor in there?
So input is clearly welcome, and I'll surely post design updates and pictures should I actually get to the build. I'm not great with acrylic, but I've done a few things and feel I can succeed in putting another sump together. Thanks!!
|
|
|
|
Registered Members don't see these ads. Register now it's free!
|
|
|
|
12-03-2007, 02:26 PM
|
#2
|
|
spaceman spiff

Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: south of Dimples
Posts: 10,636
Reviews: 72
|
I called my local dealer, as I was curious about different thicknesses. I've been using 1/4" Acrylite FF for other projects, and I wanted to know how much more it was to step up to 3/8". The answer is; cost prohibitive. Since I don't have a huge car, I asked for four sheets of 48"x36". For 1/4", they quoted $36 per sheet. For 3/8", the quote launched to $84 each.
So I will be using 1/4" for this build, but being 46" long should I include some cross braces in the top? I'd prefer not, mostly do to access, but maybe it'd be a better idea. Thoughts?
|
|
|
12-03-2007, 02:28 PM
|
#3
|
|
Enjoy it now
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Chattanooga, TN
Posts: 4,087
|
So 1/4" is acceptable for this? I'm assuming that with baffles, the strength increases, right? I'm thinking of building my own sump out of acrylic too and will follow this thread closely 
|
|
|
12-03-2007, 02:40 PM
|
#4
|
|
spaceman spiff

Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: south of Dimples
Posts: 10,636
Reviews: 72
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DarthOcellaris
So 1/4" is acceptable for this? I'm assuming that with baffles, the strength increases, right? I'm thinking of building my own sump out of acrylic too and will follow this thread closely 
|
I dunno, but I'm sure going to use it!!
I've seen many built this size with only 1/4" material, but most have cross braces as well as a perimeter brace. Example.
|
|
|
12-03-2007, 02:42 PM
|
#5
|
|
Enjoy it now
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Chattanooga, TN
Posts: 4,087
|
sweet!..I remember that sump from a while back. I hope you post LOTS of pics so us newbies can learn how to work with acrylic  
|
|
|
12-03-2007, 04:22 PM
|
#6
|
|
The Ninja MOD

Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Planet P.....Why Me?
Posts: 13,624
Reviews: 23
|
I built my sump out of 1/4 also. I think youll be fine without braces. Th baffles will add enough strength.
|
|
|
12-03-2007, 08:06 PM
|
#7
|
|
Big Fishy
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Brampton, Ontario
Posts: 579
|
Would it really hurt any to have the cross brace? Especially when you consider the overall volume of the sump? Or worse... picturing the contents of it on your floor?
All I'm saying is to think of a tank that is 48" or longer, what do they all have in common when the thickness of the glass doesn't measure a certain amount?... They all have center bracing. But this is just my opinion.
|
|
|
12-03-2007, 08:20 PM
|
#8
|
|
The Ninja MOD

Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Planet P.....Why Me?
Posts: 13,624
Reviews: 23
|
Good point. B ut dont forget, the baffles are melted to each side panel and if done correctly they wil hold the sides together. Also, the baffle placement covers the lebgth pretty well. Of course extra support never hurts when it comes to a lood!
|
|
|
12-03-2007, 08:27 PM
|
#9
|
|
Enjoy it now
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Chattanooga, TN
Posts: 4,087
|
Yeah, the baffle walls are essentially your bracing. makes sense.
|
|
|
12-03-2007, 08:29 PM
|
#10
|
|
The Ninja MOD

Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Planet P.....Why Me?
Posts: 13,624
Reviews: 23
|
And, since the baffles are attached just about the whole way from top to bottom (or at least a large part of the distance), they will do more to prevent bowing than a top brace.
Of course the quality of the joints is key.
|
|
|
12-03-2007, 08:32 PM
|
#11
|
|
Reefless Reefer
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Durham, NC
Posts: 20,561
|
i would just put the skimmer outlet back in the skimmer section. who cares if the water is skimmed more than once. plus it makes it that much harder for any escaping micro bubbles to get to the return pump.
G~
__________________
Think Tanker
Friends Don't Let Friends Use Refugiums!
Reef Knowledge Impaired
"J" crowd member.
My Build Thread
|
|
|
12-03-2007, 08:34 PM
|
#12
|
|
Enjoy it now
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Chattanooga, TN
Posts: 4,087
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Geoff
i would just put the skimmer outlet back in the skimmer section. who cares if the water is skimmed more than once. plus it makes it that much harder for any escaping micro bubbles to get to the return pump.
G~
|
I always thought that was a bad idea. I thought if you re-skim already-skimmed water, it's just wasting the effectiveness. Of course, This might be the same thing as a recirc skimmer
|
|
|
12-03-2007, 10:12 PM
|
#13
|
|
spaceman spiff

Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: south of Dimples
Posts: 10,636
Reviews: 72
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Motorslave
Good point. B ut dont forget, the baffles are melted to each side panel and if done correctly they wil hold the sides together. Also, the baffle placement covers the lebgth pretty well. Of course extra support never hurts when it comes to a lood!
|
Heh, you'll be the judge of the quality of the joints once I get to building.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DarthOcellaris
I always thought that was a bad idea. I thought if you re-skim already-skimmed water, it's just wasting the effectiveness. Of course, This might be the same thing as a recirc skimmer
|
I appreciate what Geoff's saying... what you're saying Andy assumes that you pull everything out of the water on the first time around. Probably not very realistic. But, I can just design it this way and try it, see what works better.
I've also considered using the middle section for frag grow out, but we'll see if we get that setup.
|
|
|
12-04-2007, 07:52 PM
|
#14
|
|
spaceman spiff

Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: south of Dimples
Posts: 10,636
Reviews: 72
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by crvz
I've also considered using the middle section for frag grow out, but we'll see if we get that setup.
|
Through today, during an all-day class, my mind may have wandered. I'm beginning to give this notion more credence, so let's run with this idea for a bit.
1) How well would the settling area (middle of the sump) double as a "raceway" for frags?
2) I was thinking about lighting, and considered 150W MH being adequate. It would be only ~8" deep by 15"x18" footprint (if it were wider, I'd probably run with T5 bulbs). I'd probably run the light 5-6 hours per day in the middle of the night. Any objections?
|
|
|
12-04-2007, 09:06 PM
|
#15
|
|
The Ninja MOD

Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Planet P.....Why Me?
Posts: 13,624
Reviews: 23
|
The only issue I see is water changes along with the cleaning. How would you get the gunk out from under and what kind of turmoil would the frags go through during a wter change?
Hmmmm, the water changes could be made a non-issue if you set up a WC tank like I have dont for the 150 build. That would keep them un bothered. If ou got a small wet dry vac you could quickly suck the junk off of the bottom too.
|
|
|
|