Sponsor Our Community
Go Back   The Reef Tank > Reef Discussion Forums > General Reef Discussion

General Reef Discussion In this forum we discuss issues related to keeping marine and reef aquariums in a friendly flame-free environment.


Registered Members don't see these ads. Register now it's free!

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 09-14-2005, 10:29 PM   #1
reef_noob
The Dude Abides
 
reef_noob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: RI
Posts: 1,129
Images: 1
Angry

Swingarm Hydrometers = Useless


Well, I finally got my refractometer and tested several different sets of water with both the hydrometer and refractometer.

The results:

DI water @ 1ppm tds

Hydrometer: no indication/0
Refractometer: 0

Nano tank(5.5 gal total vol):

Hydrometer: 1.025
Refractometer: 1.030

Main tank(65 gal total vol):

Hydrometer: 1.025
Refractometer: 1.030


I think the results speak for themselves.
Presuming that the refractometer is calibrated correctly(which it should be based on the DI reading,) the swingarm is useless.

Save your money and sanity.
Buy a refractometer.
Registered Members don't see these ads. Register now it's free!
__________________
-Chris

Proud member of the

All Hail Discordia!
reef_noob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2005, 10:46 PM   #2
capt2000
Big Fishy
 
capt2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: TX
Posts: 391
they matched at zero and were consistant in other samples, which one is right?
capt2000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2005, 10:46 PM   #3
VWD
BIG SMELLY MOD
 
VWD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Livingston Parish, Denham Springs, Louisiana
Posts: 16,922
Images: 421
thats right, one thing I notice it your TDS (DI water @ 1ppm tds) Getting close to change time on the DI cartridge, Ro you can go to 10 % of input TDS but RO/DI 1 or 2 ppm is max.They don't lst long.I don't know how many people change them that way. I try to.
__________________


Vince aka VINNIE
VWD is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2005, 10:50 PM   #4
capt2000
Big Fishy
 
capt2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: TX
Posts: 391
you need to test the two against a given, known, contant. You can only show the difference this way
capt2000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2005, 10:52 PM   #5
VWD
BIG SMELLY MOD
 
VWD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Livingston Parish, Denham Springs, Louisiana
Posts: 16,922
Images: 421
Ro thats right DI need to be 0
__________________


Vince aka VINNIE
VWD is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2005, 10:54 PM   #6
VWD
BIG SMELLY MOD
 
VWD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Livingston Parish, Denham Springs, Louisiana
Posts: 16,922
Images: 421
I have imput TDS at 250 ppm, My output with RO/DI 0 if I had no DI and only RO, 25ppm will be ok, But even with DI 1 or even 2 ppm is better then 250 ppm.
__________________


Vince aka VINNIE
VWD is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2005, 10:57 PM   #7
capt2000
Big Fishy
 
capt2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: TX
Posts: 391
i was speaking of the salt readings. they are diferent but compared to what? which is right? compared to? not argueing the readings to swing arm .025 the refract .030 in two samples, it doesn't say which is properly calabrated especially if both show the same zero
capt2000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2005, 10:59 PM   #8
VWD
BIG SMELLY MOD
 
VWD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Livingston Parish, Denham Springs, Louisiana
Posts: 16,922
Images: 421
Quote:
Originally Posted by capt2000
i was speaking of the salt readings. they are diferent but compared to what? which is right? compared to? not argueing the readings to swing arm .025 the refract .030 in two samples, it doesn't say which is properly calabrated especially if both show the same zero

Your right there, have to be calbrated. I see what You are saying.
__________________


Vince aka VINNIE
VWD is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2005, 11:02 PM   #9
JCox
10:13
 
JCox's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Maryland
Posts: 317
Does it really matter if his 'test' RO/DI water has a TDS of 1? A refractometer is measuring salinity/SG, not TDS. As long as his RO/DI is reading a spot-on 1 on the refractometer, I would assume that he is calibrated correctly.
JCox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2005, 11:02 PM   #10
xaoss23
A Chaotic Fishy
 
xaoss23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Alpharetta, Ga
Posts: 1,256
very good catch capt2000...
__________________
Tony/.
xaoss23 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2005, 11:05 PM   #11
capt2000
Big Fishy
 
capt2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: TX
Posts: 391
its like two identical cars at a red light both read zero. A has tires at 25 psi B has tires at 35 psi. both show 60mph B is pulling away. A radar shows A at 57 and B at 62. radar is the control or given.
capt2000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2005, 11:08 PM   #12
JCox
10:13
 
JCox's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Maryland
Posts: 317
I still don't understand what TDS would have to do with a refractometer calibration. Case in point, I have a refractometer that came with 'ultra pure test water' that tests 0 on my refractometer. I have also tested plain old tap water, TDS ~110, and this also shows a spot-on 0 on my refractometer. Am I missing something?
JCox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2005, 11:11 PM   #13
reef_noob
The Dude Abides
 
reef_noob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: RI
Posts: 1,129
Images: 1
I should've been a bit clearer: With the DI, the refractometer read 1.000
The swingarm can't go to 1.000. It drops below the bottom of the range, which is 1.012.

Capt, you are correct. Presuming that the swingarm reads 1.000 with the DI(which is not something we can reasonably presume), then there is no reason to suggest that the refractometer works better than the swingarm other than anecdotal evidence from others about the accuracy of refractometers over hydrometers.

However, given that the DI reads 1.000(edit: with the refractometer), we can safely reason that the refractometer is correctly calibrated. Thus it's either faulty from the factory, or the hydrometer is incorrect. Which seems more likely?
__________________
-Chris

Proud member of the

All Hail Discordia!
reef_noob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2005, 11:12 PM   #14
reef_noob
The Dude Abides
 
reef_noob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: RI
Posts: 1,129
Images: 1
Quote:
Originally Posted by JCox
I still don't understand what TDS would have to do with a refractometer calibration. Case in point, I have a refractometer that came with 'ultra pure test water' that tests 0 on my refractometer. I have also tested plain old tap water, TDS ~110, and this also shows a spot-on 0 on my refractometer. Am I missing something?
No but the instructions suggested using distilled water to calibrate, DI was the closest I could come.
__________________
-Chris

Proud member of the

All Hail Discordia!
reef_noob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2005, 11:15 PM   #15
capt2000
Big Fishy
 
capt2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: TX
Posts: 391
no, he was comparing two tools against the same thing without knowing which was right. I agree swing arms are inacurate, salt build up etc., but if your control is rodi at 0 then my last post makes sense
capt2000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
ppm tds , salinity meter , swing arm hydrometer , swing arm hydrometers , tds reading



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Sitemap:1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190
Sponsor Our Community

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:54 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Our lawyer tells us that, by pressing the "New Thread"