| General Reef Discussion In this forum we discuss issues related to keeping marine and reef aquariums in a friendly flame-free environment. |
Registered Members don't see these ads. Register now it's free!
09-14-2005, 10:29 PM
|
#1
|
|
The Dude Abides
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: RI
Posts: 1,129
|
Swingarm Hydrometers = Useless
Well, I finally got my refractometer and tested several different sets of water with both the hydrometer and refractometer.
The results:
DI water @ 1ppm tds
Hydrometer: no indication/0
Refractometer: 0
Nano tank(5.5 gal total vol):
Hydrometer: 1.025
Refractometer: 1.030
Main tank(65 gal total vol):
Hydrometer: 1.025
Refractometer: 1.030
I think the results speak for themselves.
Presuming that the refractometer is calibrated correctly(which it should be based on the DI reading,) the swingarm is useless.
Save your money and sanity.
Buy a refractometer.
|
|
|
|
Registered Members don't see these ads. Register now it's free!
|
__________________
- Chris
Proud member of the
 
All Hail Discordia!
|
|
|
09-14-2005, 10:46 PM
|
#2
|
|
Big Fishy
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: TX
Posts: 391
|
they matched at zero and were consistant in other samples, which one is right?
|
|
|
09-14-2005, 10:46 PM
|
#3
|
|
BIG SMELLY MOD
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Livingston Parish, Denham Springs, Louisiana
Posts: 16,922
|
thats right, one thing I notice it your TDS (DI water @ 1ppm tds) Getting close to change time on the DI cartridge, Ro you can go to 10 % of input TDS but RO/DI 1 or 2 ppm is max.They don't lst long.I don't know how many people change them that way. I try to.
__________________
Vince aka VINNIE
|
|
|
09-14-2005, 10:50 PM
|
#4
|
|
Big Fishy
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: TX
Posts: 391
|
you need to test the two against a given, known, contant. You can only show the difference this way
|
|
|
09-14-2005, 10:52 PM
|
#5
|
|
BIG SMELLY MOD
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Livingston Parish, Denham Springs, Louisiana
Posts: 16,922
|
Ro thats right DI need to be 0
__________________
Vince aka VINNIE
|
|
|
09-14-2005, 10:54 PM
|
#6
|
|
BIG SMELLY MOD
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Livingston Parish, Denham Springs, Louisiana
Posts: 16,922
|
I have imput TDS at 250 ppm, My output with RO/DI 0 if I had no DI and only RO, 25ppm will be ok, But even with DI 1 or even 2 ppm is better then 250 ppm.
__________________
Vince aka VINNIE
|
|
|
09-14-2005, 10:57 PM
|
#7
|
|
Big Fishy
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: TX
Posts: 391
|
i was speaking of the salt readings. they are diferent but compared to what? which is right? compared to? not argueing the readings to swing arm .025 the refract .030 in two samples, it doesn't say which is properly calabrated especially if both show the same zero
|
|
|
09-14-2005, 10:59 PM
|
#8
|
|
BIG SMELLY MOD
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Livingston Parish, Denham Springs, Louisiana
Posts: 16,922
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by capt2000
i was speaking of the salt readings. they are diferent but compared to what? which is right? compared to? not argueing the readings to swing arm .025 the refract .030 in two samples, it doesn't say which is properly calabrated especially if both show the same zero
|
Your right there, have to be calbrated. I see what You are saying.
__________________
Vince aka VINNIE
|
|
|
09-14-2005, 11:02 PM
|
#9
|
|
10:13
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Maryland
Posts: 317
|
Does it really matter if his 'test' RO/DI water has a TDS of 1? A refractometer is measuring salinity/SG, not TDS. As long as his RO/DI is reading a spot-on 1 on the refractometer, I would assume that he is calibrated correctly.
|
|
|
09-14-2005, 11:02 PM
|
#10
|
|
A Chaotic Fishy
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Alpharetta, Ga
Posts: 1,256
|
very good catch capt2000...
__________________
Tony/.
|
|
|
09-14-2005, 11:05 PM
|
#11
|
|
Big Fishy
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: TX
Posts: 391
|
its like two identical cars at a red light both read zero. A has tires at 25 psi B has tires at 35 psi. both show 60mph B is pulling away. A radar shows A at 57 and B at 62. radar is the control or given.
|
|
|
09-14-2005, 11:08 PM
|
#12
|
|
10:13
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Maryland
Posts: 317
|
I still don't understand what TDS would have to do with a refractometer calibration. Case in point, I have a refractometer that came with 'ultra pure test water' that tests 0 on my refractometer. I have also tested plain old tap water, TDS ~110, and this also shows a spot-on 0 on my refractometer. Am I missing something?
|
|
|
09-14-2005, 11:11 PM
|
#13
|
|
The Dude Abides
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: RI
Posts: 1,129
|
I should've been a bit clearer: With the DI, the refractometer read 1.000
The swingarm can't go to 1.000. It drops below the bottom of the range, which is 1.012.
Capt, you are correct. Presuming that the swingarm reads 1.000 with the DI(which is not something we can reasonably presume), then there is no reason to suggest that the refractometer works better than the swingarm other than anecdotal evidence from others about the accuracy of refractometers over hydrometers.
However, given that the DI reads 1.000(edit: with the refractometer), we can safely reason that the refractometer is correctly calibrated. Thus it's either faulty from the factory, or the hydrometer is incorrect. Which seems more likely?
__________________
- Chris
Proud member of the
 
All Hail Discordia!
|
|
|
09-14-2005, 11:12 PM
|
#14
|
|
The Dude Abides
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: RI
Posts: 1,129
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by JCox
I still don't understand what TDS would have to do with a refractometer calibration. Case in point, I have a refractometer that came with 'ultra pure test water' that tests 0 on my refractometer. I have also tested plain old tap water, TDS ~110, and this also shows a spot-on 0 on my refractometer. Am I missing something?
|
No but the instructions suggested using distilled water to calibrate, DI was the closest I could come.
__________________
- Chris
Proud member of the
 
All Hail Discordia!
|
|
|
09-14-2005, 11:15 PM
|
#15
|
|
Big Fishy
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: TX
Posts: 391
|
no, he was comparing two tools against the same thing without knowing which was right. I agree swing arms are inacurate, salt build up etc., but if your control is rodi at 0 then my last post makes sense
|
|
|
|