|
|
Have a question?
It's Free!
|
|
| General Reef Discussion In this forum we discuss issues related to keeping marine and reef aquariums in a friendly flame-free environment. |
Registered Members don't see these ads. Register now it's free!
08-25-2007, 01:48 PM
|
#1
|
|
Big Fishy
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: California
Posts: 586
|
Secondary Return Pump For Closed Loop
I want to set up a second return pump from my sump that will be dedicated to my closed system PVC rock rack (the rock rack has holes drilled for current). My main return pump in the sump is 900 gph and is 63 inches beneath the top of the display tank. This pump returns water through the chiller before it goes to the tank. My current overflow box set-up can handle 1000 gph.
Do people have recommendations on a secondary pump?
|
|
|
|
Registered Members don't see these ads. Register now it's free!
|
|
|
|
08-25-2007, 01:58 PM
|
#2
|
|
The Ninja MOD

Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Planet P.....Why Me?
Posts: 13,624
Reviews: 23
|
Well if you're pumping from the sump it isn't a closed loop. A closed loop has no exposure to air and is a completely closed system. If you were pumping from the tank and back into it that would be a closed loop.
The biggest issue I see is back flow. If you were set up as you describe and the power went out, the tank water would siphon back into the sump, down to the level of the rock rack in the tank. You could use a check valve but they are not recommended in general due to the fact that the saltwater environment has a tendency to render such things useless by the build up of calcium and such.
|
|
|
08-25-2007, 02:06 PM
|
#3
|
|
Ghost of reefers past
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: Southern Oregon, Way West of Dimples ;)
Posts: 25,150
|
Gotta agree with Robert on this one, I would do a second closed loop to accomplish what you want, you could set up an over the top CLS(see Geoffs build thread)
__________________
Cowboy is a verb, not a noun
|
|
|
08-25-2007, 02:23 PM
|
#4
|
|
Big Fishy
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: California
Posts: 586
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by motorslave
Well if you're pumping from the sump it isn't a closed loop. A closed loop has no exposure to air and is a completely closed system. If you were pumping from the tank and back into it that would be a closed loop.
The biggest issue I see is back flow. If you were set up as you describe and the power went out, the tank water would siphon back into the sump, down to the level of the rock rack in the tank. You could use a check valve but they are not recommended in general due to the fact that the saltwater environment has a tendency to render such things useless by the build up of calcium and such.
|
I see. Sorry about the nomenclature problem regarding the closed loop system. I worried about the backflow problem as well, and I had considered a check valave, but I hear you on the issue with check valves and salt water. Someone else had suggested installing an air pipe on the top of the return to break the siphon and halt the back flow in the event of a power outage.
|
|
|
08-25-2007, 02:24 PM
|
#5
|
|
Big Fishy
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: California
Posts: 586
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Doug1
Gotta agree with Robert on this one, I would do a second closed loop to accomplish what you want, you could set up an over the top CLS(see Geoffs build thread)
|
I'll check out Geoff's build thread. Thanks!
|
|
|
08-25-2007, 04:02 PM
|
#7
|
|
Big Fishy
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: California
Posts: 586
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jadefox
|
Okay. So I was thinking of going with the Mag 3 or 5 like the sytem described in the link, but when I went to order it, I saw that it says "Mag-Drive pumps are not recommended for saltwater aquarium external use." Hmmmmmm. Any thoughts? Should I go with a TAAM or Eheim?
|
|
|
08-25-2007, 08:28 PM
|
#8
|
|
Reefless Reefer
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Durham, NC
Posts: 20,559
|
i have used Mags in SW systems externally before. not a problem. the reason they say that is due to Calcium buildup on the impellor. if you keep your Ca levels above 350, then the heat generated around the impellor attracts Ca. eventually the Ca buildup is so much that it can cause the impellor to sieze and burn out the motor. if you keep your
Ca levels under control around 350 this should not be a problem. if you check the impellor a couple of times a year you should also be fine.
G~
__________________
Think Tanker
Friends Don't Let Friends Use Refugiums!
Reef Knowledge Impaired
"J" crowd member.
My Build Thread
|
|
|
08-25-2007, 08:30 PM
|
#9
|
|
Big Fishy
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: California
Posts: 586
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Geoff
i have used Mags in SW systems externally before. not a problem. the reason they say that is due to Calcium buildup on the impellor. if you keep your Ca levels above 350, then the heat generated around the impellor attracts Ca. eventually the Ca buildup is so much that it can cause the impellor to sieze and burn out the motor. if you keep your
Ca levels under control around 350 this should not be a problem. if you check the impellor a couple of times a year you should also be fine.
G~
|
Thanks. I'll go with the Mag 5 then. -R
|
|
|
08-28-2007, 02:22 PM
|
#10
|
|
Big Fishy
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: California
Posts: 586
|
Here's a question...would there be any advantage or disadvantage of rigging up the chiller to the CLS instead of having it in-line between the sump and the display tank?
|
|
|
08-28-2007, 02:27 PM
|
#11
|
|
Ghost of reefers past
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: Southern Oregon, Way West of Dimples ;)
Posts: 25,150
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jadefox
Thanks. I'll go with the Mag 5 then. -R
|
Typically rock racks drilled like you plan let a lot less water thru them than you might think, Personally I think a Mag 9 or 12 would give you a lot more flow, you want to keep things moving, right?
__________________
Cowboy is a verb, not a noun
|
|
|
08-29-2007, 12:21 PM
|
#12
|
|
Big Fishy
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: California
Posts: 586
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Doug1
Typically rock racks drilled like you plan let a lot less water thru them than you might think, Personally I think a Mag 9 or 12 would give you a lot more flow, you want to keep things moving, right?
|
I'm looking to upgrade now. Thanks.
|
|
|
08-29-2007, 12:27 PM
|
#13
|
|
Ghost of reefers past
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: Southern Oregon, Way West of Dimples ;)
Posts: 25,150
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jadefox
Here's a question...would there be any advantage or disadvantage of rigging up the chiller to the CLS instead of having it in-line between the sump and the display tank?
|
It will probably work either way and be fine, BUT typically you are going to push a lot more volume through a closed loop than you will through the sump. Slower velocity through the chiller should increase its efficiency I believe, as well as exposing all the water volume to the chiller.
__________________
Cowboy is a verb, not a noun
|
|
|
08-29-2007, 12:33 PM
|
#14
|
|
.
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: NW
Posts: 11,333
|
I like plumbing my chillers off of my return pumps. aIt is easy to control the amount of flow you are actually giving the chiller that way, and it is not taking away from the CLS. This is especially important on a cls that is powering spraybars, you want everything you can get to tgo to the spraybars.
You will of course need to have a return pump that has the appropriate amount opf power to power both the chiller, and to roughly match the amount of water that your skimmer can process.
__________________
I like to glue animals to rocks and put disturbing amounts of electricity and saltwater next to each other
|
|
|
08-29-2007, 12:42 PM
|
#15
|
|
Ghost of reefers past
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: Southern Oregon, Way West of Dimples ;)
Posts: 25,150
|
Fly any idea how much restriction a chiller typically adds to the return system?
One of the reasons closed loops have become popular is that it allows you way more flow rate in the display tank than you can get draining into a sump and pumping it back. Higher sump velocities tend to create more noise and salt creep issues. Slowing the throughput rate in the sump makes these issues easier to deal with and as a bonus the slower the water flows through the more likely the skimmer can process the water draining from the display tank
__________________
Cowboy is a verb, not a noun
|
|
|
|