Sponsor Our Community
Go Back   The Reef Tank > Reef Discussion Forums > General Reef Discussion

General Reef Discussion In this forum we discuss issues related to keeping marine and reef aquariums in a friendly flame-free environment.


Registered Members don't see these ads. Register now it's free!

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 05-18-2001, 11:38 PM   #1
Hermit
Fish Kahn
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: St John, WA
Posts: 246
Angry

Saying hi with a question


Thought I'd say hi before peppering y'all with questions. I've been watchin the board for a while now and like most of what I see.

I have a 55g show tank. It's currently fish only. Some day when I feel more comfortable with the hobby (and can afford a bigger tank) I will have a reef.

Now to my question. At the beginning of March I decided it was time to get rid of the UGF. I changed the substrate over to a 1" bed of dead sand and added a Penguin 330. I've also added a couple of small RIO PH for circulation. What I'm wondering is how much of the sand bed I should vacuum. With the UGF, most of the decorations were pulled out to siphon the bed. Should I continue this practice with the sand bed. Also, I have about 10# of LR.

One last question. I want to add a couple 4' NO lights. My LFS has an icecap NO only ballast for ~$75. Why couldn't I just go down to HD and get a $6 shop light.

Thanks to all.
Registered Members don't see these ads. Register now it's free!
__________________
Those that won't, talk. Those who will, listen.
Hermit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2001, 07:37 AM   #2
dark horge
vvvvvvvvvvv
 
dark horge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: The Void
Posts: 1,235
Post

Welcome, hermit

Your questions in reverse order:

2. Since its fish-only, you have a lot of leeway in choosing lights, have fun. Just keep in mind heat output. Not sure what you mean by 'shop light' --the term is too generic over here in Asia.

1. So... you have fairly thin sandbed, it ain't 'live', and you wonder how to go about siphoning it. Presuming you have no live rock (LR), you can siphon out square-foot portions at a time if you're convinced it's gotten so grotty it's affecting fish health. This saves the sand bacteria that break down fish waste (digestive and respiratory) from across-the disturbance.

However, it would be nice to have a sandbed that's partially "live": the worms and bugs can provide very healthy snacks for the fish, while helping break down fish poop and food scraps in sizes easier handled by bacteria.

Just introducing a small piece of LR can slowly seed the bed with some worms and bugs. Then you can experiment with thickening the bed in one easily-reached corner and see how it works out: a thicker bed harbors more life which can mean better water-processing power (and more snacks for fish).

I could go further, but it's better to know what sort of fish and 'decor' you've got in there

Again, welcome!


horge
__________________
doot doot doot
dark horge is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2001, 08:13 AM   #3
Hermit
Fish Kahn
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: St John, WA
Posts: 246
Post

Thanks Horge,

For clarification I do have about 10# of LR. The other decorations are bleached and fake corals. The LFS said to siphon the bed using a clamp to reduce the flow, but I'm still wondering if that would pull many of the organisms living in the sand.

For the lighting, I'm thinking ahead to when I will get my reef tank. I was just wondering if normal ballasts from a home-style flourescent would corrode from the saltwater. Is that why a NO Icecap costs so much more. For now I would put white bulbs in it, but would eventually go with Actinic bulbs with MH in the middle (at least that's the current plan).
__________________
Those that won't, talk. Those who will, listen.
Hermit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2001, 08:45 AM   #4
Doug1
Super Moderator
 
Doug1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: Southern Oregon, Way West of Dimples ;)
Posts: 21,734
Images: 1
Post

A normal shoplite setup will definatly rust up quickly in a salt water environment, plus the tar ballasts used in most of them are noisy and inefficient and will burn out expensive "Aquarium" bulbs fairly quickly.
I just checked Icecaps website and the still list the Icecap 300 which will frive a couple 4' normal flourescent tubes at greater efficiency and more even light than the cheapo shoplites do. If it is anything like the 430 and 660 series electronic ballasts I suspect it is a great product. I use a pair of 430's and love them. If you are even sorta thinking about a reef tank put the 75$ towards the purchase of a 660 ballast instead so you dont have to replace it later as you realize you need more light than a couple normal output bulbs will yield, HTH

[ 05-19-2001: Message edited by: Doug1 ]
__________________
When considering courage in battle, one should remember that there are 2 sides to every conflict.
The heroism of the losing side rarely gets remembered
but we were all husbands and fathers, sons and bros
Doug1 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2001, 10:01 AM   #5
Hermit
Fish Kahn
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: St John, WA
Posts: 246
Post

Okay, But isn't that a little overkill with the lights. The biggest tank I can sell my wife on is 100s (60x18x21). If I am going to run to 250w MH, then VHO actinics would be too much, wouldn't it (especially 4)?

Also, why the DSB? The guys at my LFS, as well as all the reefs I've seen around here don't have any sand. Don't you get as many organisms living in a 1" SB?
__________________
Those that won't, talk. Those who will, listen.
Hermit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2001, 10:11 AM   #6
Rick O
Good boy
 
Rick O's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Marietta, GA, USA
Posts: 7,881
Images: 54
Post

Hi Hermit,

Check out this VHO setup from Lamps Now: http://www.lampsnow.com/4lampvhokit.html
I have this setup on my prop tanks and it works very well. If you start out with VHO you won't have to worry about upgrading in the future.

Rick
__________________
Rick O is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2001, 11:44 AM   #7
hamburglar
Little Fishy
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: New Bern, NC
Posts: 249
Post

I have yet to see too much light. I think your supposed to add lights untill you get a sunburn while cleaning your tank
__________________
Chris Lupton
hamburglar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2001, 08:35 PM   #8
FishDaddy
Super Moderator
 
FishDaddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: TN, USA
Posts: 8,738
Post

Hi Hermit,
A good plan for any tank is to think ahead to what you intend to do with it when purchasing any equipment. We have all wasted a lot of $$$ on things that just weren't suitable for our reefs as they developed.
I have a 55 with a 660 Ice Cap ballast, running 2 VHO's. I also have an AGA 40w striplight. This is minimal lighting for a 55 but I have some very nice soft and LPS corals. I will eventually build a hood that will accomodate another two VHO's, which the 660 will drive. Another possibility would be to keep the 2 bulb VHO setup and add 2 250w metal halides. These options are possible due to the versatility of the Ice Cap 660.
This incremental lighting plan will work because I started with the right equipment. I highly recommend this approach as you develop your tank.
The NO Shoplights will work for a time and decent bulbs are available in the daylight range from Home Depot or Lowes. A regular aquarium actinic helps the color. I currently have a 2 bulb shoplight over a 38 FO that houses a baby Chainlink Moray. This tank has 40# of live rock and a 5" sandbed so its ready to be a small reef when the Chainlink outgrows the tank.

A sandbed of 4-6" would be one of the best things you can do for your tank. As it matures, such a DSB can provide all the biofiltration you need for a reef with a modest fish load. Now would be a good time to add more sand. You would never need to vacuum a DSB; in fact, you shouldn't disturb a DSB; this is done by a good crew of clean up critters.
A 1" sandbed could house some good critters, such as worms and amphipods but would not afford the capacity for the anaerobic denitrifying bacteria that really makes the sand bed work as a biofilter. The bed must be deep enough to create the anaerobic conditions necessary for these bacteria.
Here are some excellent sand bed references: http://www.reefkeepers.org/faq/cache/33.html http://www.reefs.org/library/talklog...ek_090698.html http://www.animalnetwork.com/fish/li...=&RecordNo=166
I would also commend a couple of books:
Natural Reef Aquariums by John Tullock and The Conscientious Marine Aquarist by Robert Fenner. Either is available online for less than $25. They contain comprehensive info for getting a reef started and have good refernces for fish and corals.
HTH
Dick
__________________
Every day is a good day!!
http://users.zoominternet.net/~kathywerner/gifs/jumping_fish.gif
FishDaddy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2001, 12:41 AM   #9
Hermit
Fish Kahn
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: St John, WA
Posts: 246
Talking

Thanks to everyone. Lots of good info here. I had never thought the SB could make that much of a difference.

I will keep the questions coming as I move closer to getting that 'perfect' tank.
__________________
Those that won't, talk. Those who will, listen.
Hermit is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
actinic bulb , denitrifying bacteria , ice cap ballast , john tullock , lps coral , nitrifying bacteria , robert fenner , vho actinics



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Sitemap:1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185
Sponsor Our Community

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:34 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Our lawyer tells us that, by pressing the "New Thread" or "New Reply" button, you acknowledge that the opinions and information expressed in your article are yours alone and not those of thereeftank.com, dba The Reef Tank. Further, you agree to indemnify The Reef Tank, its moderators, administrators and agents from any and all liability which may arise as a result of your article. (C)opyright 2006 TheReefTank.com