Sponsor Our Community
Go Back   The Reef Tank > Reef Discussion Forums > General Reef Discussion

General Reef Discussion In this forum we discuss issues related to keeping marine and reef aquariums in a friendly flame-free environment.


Registered Members don't see these ads. Register now it's free!

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 03-23-2006, 07:47 PM   #1
Deuce
Canadian 'eh!
 
Deuce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Prince George BC Canada
Posts: 263

hyposalinity


Being that my tank is FOWLR, I'm going to run it hyposalinic. Right now its sitting at 1.021. Is that good, or should it be lower or higher?

Thanks!!

Jason
Registered Members don't see these ads. Register now it's free!
Deuce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-23-2006, 07:49 PM   #2
Casey
Eat more PIE
 
Casey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Florida Panhandle
Posts: 18,599
Images: 111
Most people I know that do that keep it at 1.019
__________________
Double your drive space. Delete Windows

Casey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-23-2006, 08:03 PM   #3
Twitterbait
Professor Chaos
 
Twitterbait's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Arkham Asylum
Posts: 9,749
Images: 1
that would be the high end
__________________
I mix twinkies and ding dongs all the time, in Europe they call it a Dinky -- Homer Simpson
Twitterbait is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-23-2006, 08:08 PM   #4
Deuce
Canadian 'eh!
 
Deuce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Prince George BC Canada
Posts: 263
Quote:
Originally Posted by Twitterbait
that would be the high end
What would be the high end? The 1.021 that I have, or the 1.019 that Casey suggested?

I guess what I want to know, what is the ideal salinity for a hyposalinic tank?
Deuce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-23-2006, 10:49 PM   #5
Twitterbait
Professor Chaos
 
Twitterbait's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Arkham Asylum
Posts: 9,749
Images: 1
1.019 is good. don't go below 1.017 or above 1.021 for hypo.
__________________
I mix twinkies and ding dongs all the time, in Europe they call it a Dinky -- Homer Simpson
Twitterbait is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-23-2006, 10:51 PM   #6
Deuce
Canadian 'eh!
 
Deuce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Prince George BC Canada
Posts: 263
Quote:
Originally Posted by Twitterbait
1.019 is good. don't go below 1.017 or above 1.021 for hypo.
That clears things up, thank you!
Deuce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-23-2006, 10:58 PM   #7
Twitterbait
Professor Chaos
 
Twitterbait's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Arkham Asylum
Posts: 9,749
Images: 1
Sure thing, I have had Zero problem with fish disease since i went to 1.019. Glad to help
__________________
I mix twinkies and ding dongs all the time, in Europe they call it a Dinky -- Homer Simpson
Twitterbait is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2006, 10:27 AM   #8
Kevin1000
----------------
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 1,079
What are you trying to accomplish? Slightly lowering salinity levels provides some stress relief to fish but has no direct impact on ich.

In the old days people thought the running tanks at 1.019 -1.021 was an effective method for keeping the tank ich free ... those days are long gone since the ich parasite long ago adapted to those levels of salinity. Fish are regularly shipped by the wholesaler at levels of about 1.019 .. not for ich reasons but because the lower salinity level is suppose to provide some level of stress relief to the fish.

Running a FOWL at 1.019 - 1.021 should not have any adverse impact on the fish ... however you should note that if you have anything else in the tank (snails etc) that live in a reef environment - those reef critters would prefer a salinity closer to that of a reef 1.025 or so.

If you dealing with an ich problem you will need to QT and use hypo which would require an SG of about 1.009. Also remember that hypo doesn't kill ich on the fish ... it simply interupts the ich life cycle by preventing the tomont/cyst stage of ich from hatching.

Hope this helps.
Kevin1000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2006, 12:46 PM   #9
Twitterbait
Professor Chaos
 
Twitterbait's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Arkham Asylum
Posts: 9,749
Images: 1
You answered your own post... It provides stress relief, which is the biggest cause of ich taking over. Healthy fish that are not stressed will not succumb to ick even if it is present in the system. And i have never had a single problem with my inverts at a lower salinity. that includes shrimp, snails, crabs, corals, etc...
__________________
I mix twinkies and ding dongs all the time, in Europe they call it a Dinky -- Homer Simpson
Twitterbait is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2006, 12:47 PM   #10
Casey
Eat more PIE
 
Casey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Florida Panhandle
Posts: 18,599
Images: 111
It allows the water to have more oxygen for the fish which will releave stress and lower the chance for ich.
__________________
Double your drive space. Delete Windows

Casey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2006, 01:17 PM   #11
Kevin1000
----------------
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 1,079
Lowering salinity levels is suppose to provide less stress to a fish because it allows the fish to excrete salt using less energy. While stress does impact a fish's immune system which inturn will impact how well a fish can handle the effects of ich .. there is no direct correlation between stress and ich - thats an old myth.

If you have ich within your system ... its because you placed it there. If you put an ich free fish in an ich free system you can stress it as much as you want and that fish will never get ich.

Heres a quote from Terry Bartlemes 5 part series on ich
http://www.marineaquariumadvice.com/...um_fish_1.html

Myth and misconception
It is a common misconception among hobbyists that fish must be in a weakened state before they are susceptible to infection with Cryptocaryon irritans. Stress is a factor as it does reduce immune function in fish. This makes it less likely that fish will develop some level of acquired immunity after becoming infected. However, stress (or weakened condition) is not a prerequisite to infection with Cryptocaryon irritans. Healthy fish that are not unduly stressed are susceptible to infection upon exposure to this pathogen
Kevin1000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2006, 01:20 PM   #12
Casey
Eat more PIE
 
Casey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Florida Panhandle
Posts: 18,599
Images: 111
Lets just say stress can increase the chances then.
__________________
Double your drive space. Delete Windows

Casey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2006, 01:27 PM   #13
Twitterbait
Professor Chaos
 
Twitterbait's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Arkham Asylum
Posts: 9,749
Images: 1
Perhaps... Perhaps not... I Prefer to quote my own experience. I have never had ick in my tanks and i have always kept them hyposalinic. Whatever Terry Bartlemes says if fine for him... But my experience has been different. I helped out at an lfs where he always kept the salinity at 1.023-1.025 and he always had someone with ick. I brought a few fish home before they caught it in the tanks at the shop and they have never had a single white spot since in my system. My corals fish and inverts thrive... Thats proof enough for me.
__________________
I mix twinkies and ding dongs all the time, in Europe they call it a Dinky -- Homer Simpson
Twitterbait is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2006, 01:32 PM   #14
Kevin1000
----------------
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 1,079
Ich is probably the most researched of any SW disease out there and there isn't much about ich that isn't known. Unfortunately the aquaculture industry which provides the funding for research does not give a rip on how to kill ich within a reef tank.
Kevin1000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
cryptocaryon irritans , lower salinity



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Sitemap:1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190
Sponsor Our Community

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:26 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Our lawyer tells us that, by pressing the "New Thread" or "New Reply" button, you acknowledge that the opinions and information expressed in your article are yours alone and not those of thereeftank.com, dba The Reef Tank. Further, you agree to indemnify The Reef Tank, its moderators, administrators and agents from any and all liability which may arise as a result of your article. (C)opyright 2006 TheReefTank.com