Sponsor Our Community
Go Back   The Reef Tank > Reef Discussion Forums > General Reef Discussion

General Reef Discussion In this forum we discuss issues related to keeping marine and reef aquariums in a friendly flame-free environment.


Registered Members don't see these ads. Register now it's free!

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 02-09-2008, 10:52 PM   #1
dvdj65
Little Fishy....Lot Broke
 
dvdj65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Seneca, South Carolina
Posts: 279

Easy ? Wet/dry


can someone explain what is wet skimming and dry skimming I think I know but I would like to be sure.
Registered Members don't see these ads. Register now it's free!
__________________
David
dvdj65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2008, 10:52 PM   #2
Fat Tony
Oops I fragged it again!
 
Fat Tony's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Greenville,SC
Posts: 2,959
Images: 4
wet- light tea colored skim, more watery.. dry- dark nasty skim, drier, not as much water in skimmate
__________________
My 75Gal RR tank build

Upstate SC Reefers Unite!! Join the PMAC!
Fat Tony is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2008, 10:55 PM   #3
chrischris
SHARK
 
chrischris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: DFW, Texas
Posts: 2,005
Images: 54
there ya go
you can acheive this by raising the base level of foam higher for wet and lower for dry
__________________
Chris
chrischris not tomtom
chrischris is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2008, 10:55 PM   #4
motorslave
The Ninja MOD
 
motorslave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Planet P.....Why Me?
Posts: 12,117
To get wt skimming, raise the water level in the skimmer so the foam is close to the top of the neck, to get dry, lower it.
__________________
After 2 years I finally have water in it! (no, really)!
Where is Planet P?
motorslave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2008, 10:58 PM   #5
dvdj65
Little Fishy....Lot Broke
 
dvdj65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Seneca, South Carolina
Posts: 279
is there pro or con to either method?
__________________
David
dvdj65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2008, 10:59 PM   #6
chrischris
SHARK
 
chrischris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: DFW, Texas
Posts: 2,005
Images: 54
with wet skimming you get more crud out of your system
but you have to empty your collection cup more offten
with dry skimming you get less crud out of your system
but you can prolong emptying your skimmer for a while(i skim dry when i go on vacation but wet when im home)
__________________
Chris
chrischris not tomtom
chrischris is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2008, 11:02 PM   #7
motorslave
The Ninja MOD
 
motorslave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Planet P.....Why Me?
Posts: 12,117
There is actually more to it than that. What it is I don't remember. maybe Tom will pop in an give us a dissertation on it!
__________________
After 2 years I finally have water in it! (no, really)!
Where is Planet P?
motorslave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2008, 11:03 PM   #8
dvdj65
Little Fishy....Lot Broke
 
dvdj65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Seneca, South Carolina
Posts: 279
ok thanks
__________________
David
dvdj65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2008, 11:04 PM   #9
chrischris
SHARK
 
chrischris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: DFW, Texas
Posts: 2,005
Images: 54
ya i just gave you the extremly simplified version
__________________
Chris
chrischris not tomtom
chrischris is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2008, 10:50 AM   #10
aquawolf
Keeper of the Kracken
 
aquawolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Martin, SC
Posts: 4,704
Images: 10
I'm tagging along in hopes that Tom will respond as well.

Good question David.
__________________
Good Judgement Comes From Experience
Experience Comes From Poor Judgement

---- View pictures of My 75 Reef here on TRT ----
+++++ Check out My Picture Book Thread +++++
aquawolf is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2008, 11:06 AM   #11
dvdj65
Little Fishy....Lot Broke
 
dvdj65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Seneca, South Carolina
Posts: 279
Tom oohhh tom where are you? LOL
__________________
David
dvdj65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2008, 01:35 PM   #12
snow_man84088
Big Fishy
 
snow_man84088's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Utah
Posts: 814
Quote:
Originally Posted by aquawolf View Post
I'm tagging along in hopes that Tom will respond as well.

Good question David.
Ditto!
snow_man84088 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2008, 02:33 PM   #13
dvdj65
Little Fishy....Lot Broke
 
dvdj65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Seneca, South Carolina
Posts: 279
Hmmmm, bump =)
__________________
David
dvdj65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2008, 06:42 PM   #14
tdwyatt
senior member
 
tdwyatt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Walnut Grove, SC, USA
Posts: 13,316
Images: 3


Tony brought this to my attention.


Although there are more than just the advantages of removing the particulates and more DOC's from the water column by wet skimming, it makes controlling your salinity much more difficult. If you wet skim, you need to replace a volume of seawater equal to what you skim off every day, then measure your SG to determine what you've lost in terms of evaporation so you know about how much FW RO/DI to add to make your salinity 35 PPT. This means that your salinity is going to be varying each day based on reestablishing your proper salinity once a day, much like having a once a day top off system with normal or skimmerless systems, as there is not a simple way to determine what your evaporative losses in a day with such a rapid loss of saline water via the wet skimmate. If the system is having problems, and there are issues with heavy phosphate and/or nitrate as may be demonstrated by heavy or rapid algal growth on the glass, then blasting the rock with a power head and heavy siphoning to remove detritus from rock crevasses and running your skimmte very wet (to remove the stuff the "blasting" suspends) would be in your best interest, but only for short periods of time. If there were some way of determining with a "salinity controller" the salinity of the water column, you could connect it to a source of ASW and RO/DI so that it would correct your salinity by adding either ASW or FW to the tank to make it right, however, I am not aware of such a device to maintain constant salinity for creatures in the tank. Such fluctuations make it very hard on captive corals and the inverts we like to keep (like snails, shrimps, and echinoderms in general, etc.). Ideally, you would adjust your skimmer to wet skim while blasting the rock and corners of the tank to suspend detritus, run it that way for 4 or so hours with any ATO devices turned off, then correct your sump level with ASW and correct your salinity to make up for whatever evaporative water losses occurred in that short period, then turn your skimmer back to dry skimming an turn the ATO back on once salinity and the sump level have been corrected to the norms.

In actuality, it there were some way to automatically correct for the salt loses represented by wet skimming, as well as correct for evaporative losses without a constant "zero" starting point for system volume (how the ATO's work now), then I would rather have wet skimming all the time. Wet skimming removes more of the DOC's before they have a chance to decompose (remember that they decompose to source out constituent levels of phosphate and nitrate), it remove more particulates, and it performs an automatic method of water change depending on how much water is lost with the level of skimming the aquarist selects. However, there is no way currently available at a reasonable price to do this and still keep the salinity stable. This leaves wet skimming as either a once-a-week method to use for tank cleaning days or relegated to the use by those that have lots of time to maintain the system salinity manually each day or multiple times a day (or for those that 100% flush the system once a day with natural SW with semi-open systems, but these systems really do not even need skimmers, so this is kind of moot).


HTH
__________________
Tom <"))))>(
(TDWyatt)
Wise men speak because they have something to say; fools, because they have to say something. -Plato
tdwyatt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2008, 06:55 PM   #15
tufacody
Little Fishy
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: MN
Posts: 280
hmmm, i thought that wet skimming was also more likely to remove important trace elements, and that this was the con against it. I can certainly see the salinity argument for smaller tanks though
tufacody is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
power head , wet skimmate , wet skimming



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Sitemap:1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183
Sponsor Our Community

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:06 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Our lawyer tells us that, by pressing the "New Thread" or "New Reply" button, you acknowledge that the opinions and information expressed in your article are yours alone and not those of thereeftank.com, dba The Reef Tank. Further, you agree to indemnify The Reef Tank, its moderators, administrators and agents from any and all liability which may arise as a result of your article. (C)opyright 2006 TheReefTank.com