Sponsor Our Community
Go Back   The Reef Tank > Reef Club Forums > TCMAS

TCMAS Twin Cities Marine Aquarium Society Club Forum


Registered Members don't see these ads. Register now it's free!

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 07-18-2006, 06:14 PM   #1
davidsreef
Nano reefer!
 
davidsreef's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: River Falls, WI
Posts: 351

What's the best...???


Hey!
I want a more "bluer" tank than what my 175W 10,000K XM bulb is giving me (I also have a 65w PC on the tank), so I am thinking of going to a 14,000 or 15,000K bulb. What are your suggestions and preferences for a brand for my 175W? Growth doesn't have to be very fast due to my small tank and its getting full very quickly.
Also, what is a good master test kit? Reason I am asking is I am starting to help out greg_s with his little store in Eau Claire, WI and we are looking for suggestions. He has a Hagen master test kit, but I don't like it, and it doesn't seem very accurate. I know that Salifart is very popular and accurate, but do they make a "master" test kit to cover all of the important tests?
Thanks again!!
David
Registered Members don't see these ads. Register now it's free!
davidsreef is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2006, 06:19 PM   #2
mtfatwork
TCMAS President
 
mtfatwork's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Lakeland, MN
Posts: 4,943
Images: 11
David I use the 15k xm's, but I think I am gonna switch to 20k soon here.
__________________
click on this tcmas I dare you!
mtfatwork is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2006, 07:05 PM   #3
darasy
hi donate me stuff ok?
 
darasy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: South Minneapolis
Posts: 284
20k xms over here
__________________
my tank is calling for me to put water in it...
oh btw looking for a ~30 g tank for sale drilled preferably
darasy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2006, 07:28 PM   #4
davidsreef
Nano reefer!
 
davidsreef's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: River Falls, WI
Posts: 351
Mary - What is your reasoning for switching? I had thought about 20k as well, but haven't decided if I want to yet but you guys are starting to change my mind
davidsreef is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2006, 11:47 PM   #5
JnS
micro nut
 
JnS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: TWIN CITIES
Posts: 4,853
use the 20k, it has a higher PAR value
__________________
JnS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2006, 11:48 PM   #6
mtfatwork
TCMAS President
 
mtfatwork's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Lakeland, MN
Posts: 4,943
Images: 11
Quote:
Originally Posted by JnS
use the 20k, it has a higher PAR value

I also like the blue color. It looks more crisp to me.
__________________
click on this tcmas I dare you!
mtfatwork is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2006, 11:58 PM   #7
DevilBoy
Caitlin Renee 6/29/07
 
DevilBoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Wooster, Ohio
Posts: 3,168
Images: 1
David
Salifert has some kits available, i think one is called a reef kit or something to that effect. i will look for it and post the link here. and yes i would use salifert over any others
DevilBoy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2006, 12:15 AM   #8
rihanssu
Mr. Bunny Rabbit
 
rihanssu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Cottage Grove, MN
Posts: 1,370
Quote:
Originally Posted by JnS
use the 20k, it has a higher PAR value
look into this, i'v heard that 20Ks actually have lower par then the 10 or 15ks.
__________________
Don't ever accept a beverage from Smeese.
rihanssu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2006, 12:32 AM   #9
JnS
micro nut
 
JnS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: TWIN CITIES
Posts: 4,853
Quote:
Originally Posted by rihanssu
look into this, i'v heard that 20Ks actually have lower par then the 10 or 15ks.
http://www.reeflightinginfo.arvixe.com/articles.htm
__________________
JnS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2006, 12:38 AM   #10
redwinger
Got Crabs?
 
redwinger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Woodbury, MN
Posts: 5,526
20k xm is allways higher than the 15k xm bulbs. The 10k's kick the crap out of all of them on par. I ran the 250w 20k xm's for about 8 months and liked the color that they produced but the tank looked way to dim for me. Switcehd to 10k and run 440w of actinics and it is much more appealing to my eye.
__________________
<a href="http://www.suburbanchrysler.com/home.html">St Paul Chrysler</a>
<a href="http://www.suburbanchrysler.com/home.html">Minneapolis Chrysler</a>
redwinger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2006, 10:19 AM   #11
davidsreef
Nano reefer!
 
davidsreef's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: River Falls, WI
Posts: 351
Thanks everyone for the help on the bulbs. I think you guys have changed my mind and I will go with the 20k XM. That's supprising for me to hear that the 20k have higher PAR than the 15k. Crazy.
Devilboy - thanks for the info on Salifert.
davidsreef is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2006, 03:23 PM   #12
David Grigor
TCMAS Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Brooklyn Center, MN
Posts: 5,665
Images: 7
Not for sure why Salifert not having a "Kit" is important. I personally don't want to buy a kit with some tests in it that I may not need. I prefer to buy them individually anyway and you will find that you use up some regents more quickly than others so after the initial purchase you would probably end up buying individually anyhow.....

Downside to using 175W IME is that you don't have quite the flexibility as with higher wattages to play around with bulbs without really sacrificing light. If this were me, I would do like John Redwinger did and add additional supplments to achieve the color I want and not go to a higher K bulb than a 10K in the 175W size.
David Grigor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2006, 04:46 PM   #13
davidsreef
Nano reefer!
 
davidsreef's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: River Falls, WI
Posts: 351
David Grigor - Good point about the individual kits vs. master kit. You sold me.
About the lights, I do have 65w PC actinic, so I have some supplemental lighting. This is over my 20g, so if I upgraded to a 250W MH, I might have heat issues, otherwise I would have loved to have a 250W. Does my 65W PC seem enough? It would be hard for me to fit another, but I suppose it could be done
davidsreef is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2006, 05:24 PM   #14
David Grigor
TCMAS Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Brooklyn Center, MN
Posts: 5,665
Images: 7
PCs being rather flat they do take up quite a bit of space. 20g would certainly be a challenge. You may get buy with stuffing more bulbs ( or just getting more output from a single bulb ) if you went with VHOs or T5s as your supplements. Also, depending on the corals you have going with a 20K XM may not be bad but you will be sacrificing some light as a result. Worst case, you would just have to put the 10K bulb back if it isn't working out and be out the cost of the bulb.
David Grigor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2006, 05:36 PM   #15
davidsreef
Nano reefer!
 
davidsreef's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: River Falls, WI
Posts: 351
I was thinking of trying a 20k and see how I like it. If I don't, I can always go back to the 10k. I would loose some light, but right now that isn't a big concern due to my current corals growing quite fast. Although I will take that into consideration.
Thanks for your input!
davidsreef is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
eau claire , hagen master test kit , master test kit


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Sitemap:1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190
Sponsor Our Community

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:50 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Our lawyer tells us that, by pressing the "New Thread" or "New Reply" button, you acknowledge that the opinions and information expressed in your article are yours alone and not those of thereeftank.com, dba The Reef Tank. Further, you agree to indemnify The Reef Tank, its moderators, administrators and agents from any and all liability which may arise as a result of your article. (C)opyright 2006 TheReefTank.com