Sponsor Our Community
Go Back   The Reef Tank > Reef Club Forums > PNWMAS

PNWMAS Pacific Northwest Marine Aquarium Society Forum


Registered Members don't see these ads. Register now it's free!

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 03-15-2005, 09:19 PM   #31
Kevin1000
----------------
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 1,066
If you read the Shimek article closely ... all it says is that certain salt mixtures are more toxic to urchin larvae --- no testing done on fish or corals --- to extrapolate or conclude that a particular salt mixture is great for a reef tank based soley on what happens to urchin larvae is not very logical.
Registered Members don't see these ads. Register now it's free!
Kevin1000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2005, 09:20 PM   #32
Lowman
Big Fishy
 
Lowman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Portland OR
Posts: 893
I think i saw the Ocean Pure salt and the Crystal sea mixes at Hollywood.
Lowman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2005, 09:31 PM   #33
Lowman
Big Fishy
 
Lowman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Portland OR
Posts: 893
Makes you wonder if Dr. Ron is biased for some reason...............
Lowman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2005, 09:33 PM   #34
jennmac415
Shark
 
jennmac415's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Andover, KS
Posts: 3,499
ok, ok I think I am justy gonna use table salt. Didn't mean to cause such a "stir" haha get it- as in "stir the salt"
jennmac415 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2005, 09:37 PM   #35
Lowman
Big Fishy
 
Lowman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Portland OR
Posts: 893
Funny I think it boils down to preference. Just like everything else in this hobby, we all have our "go to" products and tend to stick with them because in some way they have made us happy with our individual results. I am not planning on changing salt mixes anytime soon. i like my Coral Life and I don't care if it scored 26 out of 100 on the test, it does me just fine.

If it ever fails me, then i'll go to table salt, Kosher of course
Lowman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2005, 10:47 PM   #36
Sea monkey
Shark
 
Sea monkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: crystal
Posts: 2,774
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kevin1000
If you read the Shimek article closely ... all it says is that certain salt mixtures are more toxic to urchin larvae --- no testing done on fish or corals --- to extrapolate or conclude that a particular salt mixture is great for a reef tank based soley on what happens to urchin larvae is not very logical.

you are 100% right and anyone who says the s-15 tests might be biased because aqua craft were the ones who hired them are also right .however because no other salt company is willing to undergo independent testing , these are the only real tests we have to go by.

*this is my own personal opinion , take it for what its worth*

Personally i think that every salt company there is has done its own in-house testing . if they have not they really are bad businessmen. that said , if their own in-house testing reveled they had a better salt that is closer to natural seawater than the rest they would move for a independent testing IMMEDIATELY and post it EVERYWHERE, like aqua craft did ....why would they not , why would these companies not do this testing? seems to be the only reason you would not want independent public testing like this is because you already know what the results will be from your own in-house testing. like i said this is all pure conjecture but this is all the companies have left us with because they refuse to do any real testing.

Quote:
all it says is that certain salt mixtures are more toxic to urchin larvae --- no testing done on fish or corals ---
again this is true , but we have no other tests to go by that show the effects on fish and corals and that test is probably much more time consuming and costly .there still is information for us to be gained here, when you see salts like IO failed miserably to keep other saltwater organisms alive and other salts preformed almost as well as their natural environment .
Sea monkey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2005, 10:57 PM   #37
Sea monkey
Shark
 
Sea monkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: crystal
Posts: 2,774
I have obviously fallen for their hype : )
Sea monkey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2005, 02:00 AM   #38
reefcam
Going Broke
 
reefcam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: OR
Posts: 1,594
funny how many of the test will say "Natural Sea Water", but doesn't say the source of the water. So should I assume that the Ocean water is uniformly the same quality. Then I would say, stop buying salt and just head to the cost and get your water there. That'll be the cheapest and best. But I'll bet it's not.
__________________
Proud to be a "Reef Keeper"
reefcam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2005, 06:28 AM   #39
Sea monkey
Shark
 
Sea monkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: crystal
Posts: 2,774
Quote:
Originally Posted by reefcam
funny how many of the test will say "Natural Sea Water", but doesn't say the source of the water. So should I assume that the Ocean water is uniformly the same quality. Then I would say, stop buying salt and just head to the cost and get your water there. That'll be the cheapest and best. But I'll bet it's not.
it is the best, if you get it far enough off the coast that there is no pollution.
Sea monkey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2005, 06:37 PM   #40
clpcgamer
squid
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Covina, Ca.
Posts: 6
Images: 2
Has anyone tested IO for Calcium? I'm new to the Marine Reef and when I test it after mixing it is very low in Calcium. I get a reading of only about 300 - 330.
clpcgamer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2005, 09:57 PM   #41
drock59
Nothing to See Here
 
drock59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Corvallis
Posts: 903
what kind of test kit? From what i understand IO is supposed to be either high in Calc and low alk, or vice versa. cant remember
drock59 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2005, 11:06 AM   #42
impur
Nothing to See Here
 
impur's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Eugene
Posts: 1,317
Its low in calcium and good in alk. I still think oceanic is the way to go, especially if you get a good bucket. I thought maybe my last one had some of the algae spores or whatever is causing ppl problems, but that has since gone away. Just got a new jug and going strong.
impur is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2005, 12:11 PM   #43
drock59
Nothing to See Here
 
drock59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Corvallis
Posts: 903
i went oceanic to start the tnak i have now and have never had so much algae. Im sticking with IO from now on.
drock59 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2005, 04:25 PM   #44
suzstephens
Wet Sleeves
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Battle Ground, WA
Posts: 316
I use Oceanic most of the time and like it. I've used most all the common brands including Woody's and have had no problems with any of them. However, I keep only a few of the hardier sps corals, so I'm not as likely to run into problems. I often find myself using freshly mixed Oceanic which, according to Oceanic's hype, is OK. No problems here, but again, no delicate sps corals.
suzstephens is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
bio sea marine mix , brown hair algae , coralife salt , kent marine , magnesium levels , randy holmes , red algae , reef crystals , ron shimek , sea monkey , sps corals



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Sitemap:1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185
Sponsor Our Community

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:08 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Our lawyer tells us that, by pressing the "New Thread" or "New Reply" button, you acknowledge that the opinions and information expressed in your article are yours alone and not those of thereeftank.com, dba The Reef Tank. Further, you agree to indemnify The Reef Tank, its moderators, administrators and agents from any and all liability which may arise as a result of your article. (C)opyright 2006 TheReefTank.com