Sponsor Our Community
Go Back   The Reef Tank > The Reference Place > Water Chemistry Archive

Water Chemistry Archive
Water Chemistry Links


Registered Members don't see these ads. Register now it's free!

 
 
Thread Tools
Old 07-30-2003, 04:31 PM   #1
horsehunter
Plankton
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Ontario
Posts: 32

What Salt Do You Use


I would like to see a number of posts of not only what salt you use but what water and how it tests out at aquarium temp and salinity.

PH
Alkalinity
Calcium
Phosphate

I have started out using Red Sea and it comes out a little low in PH and Calcium so that after getting my targets where I want them, I am going to do a water change and start chasing numbers again.

Thanks Frank
Registered Members don't see these ads. Register now it's free!
horsehunter is offline  
Old 07-30-2003, 04:36 PM   #2
horsehunter
Plankton
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Ontario
Posts: 32
My Red Sea at 78deg and 1.025 mixed with Culligan RO water was

PH 7.8
Alk 6DKH
Ca 300
horsehunter is offline  
Old 07-30-2003, 05:36 PM   #3
Aged Salt
Plankton
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Columbus,IN.
Posts: 37
Also use RS salt--with my CR, I can also drip KW, I'm able have good #'s for my SPS tank
Aged Salt is offline  
Old 07-30-2003, 06:45 PM   #4
mnreefman
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
i use io salt.....
 
Old 07-30-2003, 08:58 PM   #5
tdwyatt
senior member
 
tdwyatt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Walnut Grove, SC, USA
Posts: 13,238
Images: 3
Morton's...


although Ms. Dash is good when I don't want all that sodium...






definitely the smart@$$ answer, IO in the aquariums...
__________________
Tom <"))))>(
(TDWyatt)
Wise men speak because they have something to say; fools, because they have to say something. -Plato
tdwyatt is offline  
Old 07-30-2003, 08:59 PM   #6
MontanaRocknReefer
Nothing to See Here
 
MontanaRocknReefer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Montana
Posts: 5,816
Images: 1
IO salt and don't test unless my critters tell me too!
MontanaRocknReefer is offline  
Old 07-30-2003, 09:57 PM   #7
cyberchef
Stress Monger
 
cyberchef's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 3,186
Images: 11
IO and everything looks fine so I can't tell you the params... Temp between 76 and 80, my thermometer is not that accurate... Stick on strip do hicky... Salinity 1.025/1.026 with a refractometer.
__________________
cyberchef
Executive Chef Montgomery Country Club
Coral Fragging Plugs

Last edited by cyberchef; 07-30-2003 at 10:00 PM.
cyberchef is offline  
Old 07-31-2003, 02:45 AM   #8
horsehunter
Plankton
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Ontario
Posts: 32
NUMBERS
I was hoping to get numbers for many different brands mixed by ordinary folk and not people with an intrest in selling salt.
Without numbers you are telling me nothing, I already know that IO has the biggest market share. There is a thread at Nano Reef where a guy is talking about low calcium levels of IO.

Frank
horsehunter is offline  
Old 07-31-2003, 06:06 AM   #9
PaintGuru
Automotive Paint Nerd
 
PaintGuru's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Livonia, MI
Posts: 603
Images: 5
See the thing is most people don't test their salt that goes into the tank because (a) the pH/alk is designed to be within the acceptable range and a 0.1 difference is insignificant, (b) most people add calcium to their tank and do not use water changes as their main source of calcium, and finally (c) we are too lazy and if it is working, why bother? As far as what salt I use, I am changing back from the Crystal Sea crap to IO again.
PaintGuru is offline  
Old 07-31-2003, 07:27 AM   #10
tdwyatt
senior member
 
tdwyatt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Walnut Grove, SC, USA
Posts: 13,238
Images: 3
Quote:
Originally posted by PaintGuru
See the thing is ... we are too lazy and if it is working, why bother? ...(especially with) IO
AMEN!!!

There is a reason that Tom Frakes salt is number one in a highly competative market, too bad he isn't still with AS.
__________________
Tom <"))))>(
(TDWyatt)
Wise men speak because they have something to say; fools, because they have to say something. -Plato
tdwyatt is offline  
Old 07-31-2003, 08:45 AM   #11
Junkzoo
Super Moderator
 
Junkzoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: NW Indiana
Posts: 10,804
Quote:
Originally posted by tdwyatt
AMEN!!!

There is a reason that Tom Frakes salt is number one in a highly competative market, too bad he isn't still with AS.
Ditto Tom!
__________________
Jeff
Original "J Crowd" Member
Junkzoo is offline  
Old 07-31-2003, 02:00 PM   #12
horsehunter
Plankton
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Ontario
Posts: 32
I f I do a water change using salt mix that is lower in PH Alk and Calcium than my tank parameters I am throwing away my additives. Iwould think you would want to use the salt that came closest to your tank targets or at least adjust your replacement water to match your tank water before doing the water change.

I am new to salt water but have kept cichlids for many years, however my cichlids happily swim in my wellwater just as it comes from my taps only corrected for temperature.

Life was so simple before salt.

Frank
horsehunter is offline  
Old 07-31-2003, 02:20 PM   #13
mnreefman
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
life is so simple now that i use io
 
Old 07-31-2003, 02:59 PM   #14
LongShot
Little Fishy
 
LongShot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: California
Posts: 146
FWIW, I think Frank makes a valid point. Salt mixes are not all the same nor are they constant over time. For example, I recently measured Ca on a fresh batch of "Brand A" at 330 ppm where as a batch of "Brand B", prepared in exactly the same way, to the same Sp.G, and allowed to "age" for the same amount of time, exhibited a Ca of 425 ppm. And when I checked "Brand A" six months ago, it showed a Ca of 400. All the calcium tests were run using a Sailfert kit, and the numbers reported here are the average results of multiple tests. The Std. Dev. on the individual data points was about 15 ppm.

In my own paticular system, I don't have a hign enough evaporative loss to get "Brand A" much above 370 ppm Ca using KW alone, and if I use enough of one of the 2-part calcium/alk supplements to boost the Ca near 400, it runs the Sp. G. up to unacceptable levels.

Now maybe I've just got too much time on my hands, or maybe I'm just prone to fussing, but I think it does make sense to pay attention to details like this.

Regards,
Bert
LongShot is offline  
Old 07-31-2003, 03:13 PM   #15
PaintGuru
Automotive Paint Nerd
 
PaintGuru's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Livonia, MI
Posts: 603
Images: 5
See the problem is, no one has ever reported "massive deaths" or "coral die-off" because of a water change where they were using the same kind of salt, just a different batch. Again I think most of us are lazy and do not even test our water unless something is visually wrong. I mean my pH swings from 7.9-8.3 from night to day respectively, do you think I care if the water change water is 8.1 compared to 8.2? Not one bit. As far as calcium goes, lets say I run my tank calcium at 400 ppm. Say I do a 10% water change with water at 350 ppm. So that means the tank now has a calcium level of (0.9*400 + 0.1*350 = 395 ppm). Again, this is insignificant. I understand making sure everything is close if you are doing say, a 50% change, but for the 10-20% most people do on a regular basis, it is not worth the trouble.

LongShot, it sounds like you need a calcium reactor, even though I'd be happy with 370 ppm Ca.
PaintGuru is offline  
 

Bookmarks

Tags
calcium reactor , nano reef , sps tank



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Sitemap:1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176
Sponsor Our Community

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:49 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Our lawyer tells us that, by pressing the "New Thread" or "New Reply" button, you acknowledge that the opinions and information expressed in your article are yours alone and not those of thereeftank.com, dba The Reef Tank. Further, you agree to indemnify The Reef Tank, its moderators, administrators and agents from any and all liability which may arise as a result of your article. (C)opyright 2006 TheReefTank.com